Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1467
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Res Med Sci 2020,  25:12

Trend of gastric cancer in a province in Western Iran: A population-based study during 2001–2014


1 Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
2 Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran

Date of Submission28-Apr-2019
Date of Decision11-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance30-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication20-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Athareh Najafi
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, P. O. Box: 66169-35391, Sanandaj
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_262_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: There are no studies on the trend of gastric cancer (GC) incidence in Kurdistan, a province in the west of Iran. We aimed to estimate the trend, age-standardized incidence rate (ASR), and annual percentage change (APC) of GC in this province during 2001–2014. Materials and Methods: The data of newly diagnosed GC patients were obtained from the regional Cancer Registering Database. The ASRs were calculated per 100,000 population during 2001–2014. Direct standardization and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by an efficient method. The temporary changes in ASRs were determined based on the APC by the joinpoint regression model. Results: Overall, 2225 newly diagnosed GC patients were identified. The ASRs ranged from 13.5 (95% CI: 10.4–17.3) to 29.0 (95% CI: 24.5–34.0). The highest ASRs were related to the men and women lived in Divandareh as 32.26 and 13.66, respectively. The respective APC value of GC incidence in women demonstrated a nonsignificant increase during 2001–2008 and a nonsignificant decrease during 2008–2014 (P = 0.1). Accordingly, the incidence of GC in men increased during 2001–2004 (P = 0.1) and decreased during 2004–2014 (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of GC showed nonsignificant and significant decreasing trends in women and men in Kurdistan province, respectively. Despite such decreasing trends, the Kurdistan province is still considered as one of the regions with high incidence of GC in Iran. Therefore, it is necessary to implement screening programs in the province to early diagnose GC.

Keywords: Incidence, Iran, joinpoint, Kurdistan, stomach neoplasms, trends


How to cite this article:
Moradzadeh R, Nadrian H, Najafi A. Trend of gastric cancer in a province in Western Iran: A population-based study during 2001–2014. J Res Med Sci 2020;25:12

How to cite this URL:
Moradzadeh R, Nadrian H, Najafi A. Trend of gastric cancer in a province in Western Iran: A population-based study during 2001–2014. J Res Med Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 28];25:12. Available from: http://www.jmsjournal.net/text.asp?2020/25/1/12/278762




  Introduction Top


Gastric cancer (GC) is a multifactorial neoplasm; its development is affected by both environmental and genetic determinants.[1] GC constitutes the fifth common neoplasm following lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide.[2],[3] In Southeast Asia, GC constitutes the most common etiology of cancer.[1] In 2015, around 1.3 million new GC cases had been diagnosed worldwide leaving behind 819,000 deaths.[4] GC has also caused 17.4 million disabilities as 98% of them contributed as the lost years of life, delivering the highest ratio among all cancers.[4]

More than 70% of GC new cases are diagnosed in developing countries.[2] The incidence of GC in Iran has been higher than other countries in the west of Asia. This higher rate has been attributed to factors such as obesity, genetic determinants, nutritional habits, and lifestyle.[5],[6],[7],[8] A relationship has also been suggested between air pollution and GC development in men.[9] Nevertheless, the disability-adjusted life years trend of GC in Iran showed a 38% decrease from 1990 to 2010.[10]

There are some studies on the trend of GC incidence in Iran and the world. However, to establish preventive measures and policies, there is a need for performing the trend analyses in local level. This is important as the risk factors of GC may vary in different regions of a country. According to the annual reporting of Ministry of Health of Iran, the incidence of GC was high in this province, and this province was identified as one of the high-risk provinces of Iran. In addition, lifestyle factors of Iranian population were changed during decades, including nutrition factors related to the GC. Therefore, there was a need to know the pattern of change of GC in parallel with the mentioned changes. On the other hand, in other regions of Iran, the traditional methods were applied to investigate the trend of cancer, but in this study, we were applied a new approach to estimate the trend of GC.

As there were no studies on the incidence rate and trend of GC in Kurdistan, a western province of Iran, here, we aimed to estimate the trend, age-standardized incidence rate (ASR), and annual percentage change (APC) of GC incidence using the archives of the regional Cancer Registering Database from 2001 to 2014. For this purpose, we applied joinpoint regression statistical software which is used to develop simple joinpoint models for cancer incidence trend.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study population

Kurdistan is a province located in the western region of Iran and constitutes eight counties. The majority of the residents of this province are farmers and ranchers. In the national census in 2016, the overall population of this province was estimated as 1,600,000 with 71% of them lived in urban areas.

In this study, all the patients newly diagnosed with GC (the International Classification of Diseases 10 code of 16) during 2001–2014 were included. In our province, local pathology clinics, laboratories, and hospitals regularly report that all the new cases of cancer are to a regional cancer registry center affiliated with the Health Deputy of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences.[11] In the case of migration of patients to other regions for diagnosis, follow–up, and treatment, these cases are still monitored by or regional cancer registry center.

After gathering the intended information, the duplicates were identified (based on comparing information such as national code, first and last names, sex, age, and address) and removed by independently reviewing the records by two of the authors (RM and AN). Finally, 2229 unique cases of GC were identified from whom four patients with unknown age were excluded from the final analysis.

The characteristics of local population that used for calculating of intended incidence rates were interpolated from the population data provided by the Iranian Health Ministry.[12] These indices included the annual birth and death rates by individual gender and age groups.

We also recorded the age, year of diagnosis, as well as patient's gender. The age spectrum of 30–80-year-old was divided into 10-year intervals including <30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and >80-year-old categories.

Statistical analysis

The ASRs were calculated per 100,000 population from 2001 to 2014. The impact of age on the incidence rate was adjusted using the direct standardization method. In this method, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are calculated applying the efficient method introduced by Consonni et al.[13] The impact of age was further adjusted based on the standard world's population.[14] The ASR is a weighted average of the age-specific incidence rates per 100,000 population, where the weights are the proportions of persons in the corresponding age groups of the standard world's population.[13] ASR with direct standardization method is obtained as weighted averages of the stratum-specific rates rj for the k groups, taking the weights (person-years Yj) from standard world's population:[13]



The results were separately presented for women and men among studied years. The estimated annual population size of each gender and age group was estimated based on the birth and death reports[12] and used to calculate the annual incidence rates.

To detect significant trends in GC incidence, the ASRs were determined based on the respective APCs and 95% CI applying the joinpoint regression model. The software takes trend of GC data and fits the simplest joinpoint model that the data allow. The user supplies the minimum and maximum number of joinpoints. The program starts with the minimum number of joinpoint (e.g., 0 joinpoint, which is a straight line) and tests whether more joinpoints are statistically significant and must be added to the model (up to that maximum number). This enables the user to test that an apparent change in trend is statistically significant by the use of Monte Carlo Permutation method. The models incorporate estimated variation for each point or use a Poisson model of variation. In addition, the software allows viewing one graph for each joinpoint model.[15],[16] The Bayesian information criterion approach was recruited to determine the optimal number of joinpoints. The “joinpoint” concept refers to the point in which multiple regression lines are met.[15],[17] The analyses were performed in STATA 12.0 (StataCorp., 2011, Stata Statistical Software: Release 12, College Station, TX, USA: StataCorp LP.) and joinpoint regression 4.7.0.0 (Joinpoint Regression Program, version 4.7.0.0, February 2019; Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute) software.


  Results Top


Descriptive analysis

Overall, 2225 newly diagnosed GC cases were identified within 2001–2014 in Kurdistan province. From these, 580 (26%) and 1645 (74%) were women and men, respectively. The highest incident cases were observed in 2008, in which 72 women and 160 men were diagnosed with GC. The highest frequency of GC was related to the women (31%) and men (33%) of 70–79 years old.

Age-standardized incidence rate estimation based on the world's standard population

The highest ASRs per 100,000 population were observed in men (32.26, 95% CI: 27.03–38.16) and women (13.66, 95% CI: 10.14–17.95) who lived in Divandareh, a county located in the north of the province. On the other hand, the lowest ASRs were observed in women (2.75, 95% CI: 1.63–4.34) who lived in Bijar and men (9.71, 95% CI: 7.06–12.92) resided in Baneh.

The range of ASRs per 100,000 population of women was 5.4 (95% CI: 3.4–8.2) in 2002 and 14.3 (95% CI: 11.1–18.0) in 2008. On the other hand, the ASR ranged from 13.5 (95% CI: 10.4–17.3) in 2002 to 29.0 (95% CI: 24.5–34.0) in 2008 per 100,000 population of men. The pooled ASRs per 100,000 general population also ranged from 9.7 (95% CI: 7.8–12.0) in 2002 to 21.8 (95% CI: 19.0–24.9) in 2008.

From 2001 to 2014, the annual ASRs per 100,000 women, men, and general population were 8.18 (95% CI: 7.51–8.89), 21.59 (95% CI: 20.52–22.71), and 15.09 (95% CI: 14.44–15.74), respectively [Table 1].
Table 1: Age-standardized annual incidence rates of gastric cancer per 100,000 population by gender in Kurdistan Province, Iran, during 2001-2014

Click here to view


The age-standardized incidence rate trends

The joinpoint regression analysis [Table 2] and [Figure 1] demonstrated that ASR in women established two trends, first insignificantly increased 8.2% (95% CI: −1.1–18.4, P = 0.1) from 2001 to 2008 and second insignificantly decreased 8.3% (95% CI: −16.3–0.6) from 2008 to 2014.
Table 2: Annual percentage changes based on the joinpoint regression model

Click here to view
Figure 1: Trends of gastric cancer according to age-standardized rates per 100,000 population in women, men, and general population in Kurdistan, Iran, from 2001 to 2014. APC: Annual percentage change

Click here to view


Similar changes were also observed in the ASRs in men diagnosed with GC during 2001–2014. In this regard, two trends also established for ASRs in men that they are nonsignificantly increased 30.0 (95% CI: −2.8–73.7, P = 0.1) during 2001–2004 and significantly decreased 3.7% (95% CI: −0.3–2.4, P = 0.001) during 2004–2014. The pooled ASRs in general population insignificantly increased 19.0% (95% CI: −1.6–43.9, P = 0.1) from 2001 to 2005 and significantly decreased 5.0% (95% CI: −9.3,−0.5) from 2005 to 2014.


  Discussion Top


The results of the present study indicated that the ASR of GC was markedly higher in men than women resided in Kurdistan province. The Divandareh country represented the highest ASR compared with other regions of the province.

Despite the increases in ASRs of GC in men (2001–2004) and women (2001–2008), these changes were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the decreasing trend of ASR observed in women during 2008–2014 was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, a statistically significant decrease was observed in ASR of GC in men from 2004 to 2014. Despite the overall decreasing trends of ASRs during 2001–2014, the incidence rate of GC in Kurdistan province remained notably higher in comparison with studies conducted in other regions of Iran. In a study in Yazd province in the center of Iran during 2005–2009, the ASRs of GC per 100,000 population were reported 4.8 and 9.4 in women and men, respectively,[18] which were considerably lower than the rates obtained in our study. In another study on the incidence and mortality rates of cancers in Western Asian countries in 2012, the ASRs of GC per 100,000 population were reported as 16.5 and 9.2 in Iranian men and women, respectively. Among three Iranian provinces with local cancer registries (i.e., Golestan, Ardbil, and Kerman provinces), the pooled ASRs of GC per 100,000 population have been recorded as 20.6 and 9.7 in men and women, respectively. In comparison with the above-mentioned rates,[19] our results rendered higher ASR in men and lower ASR in women.

In a report on the data of 25 years from 1990 to 2015 in developing countries, the age-standardized mortality rate of GC has been reported as 20.5/100,000 of Iranian population,[20] rendering a relatively low incidence to mortality ratio that emphasized on a high incidence rate of GC.[21] In another study in Guilan province of Iran from 2003 to 2011, the highest ASR of GC was reported as 15.38 in 2011,[22] which was lower compared with the value obtained in the present study. The ASRs of GC have been reported as 7.69 and 23.07 in women and men, respectively, in East Azarbaijan province in north-west of Iran during 2007–2011,[23] which were slightly higher in men and lower in women in comparison with the values reported in our study. In Khuzestan, a province in the southwest of Iran, the ASR of GC in men was reported as 13.8 from 2004 to 2008,[24] which was considerably lower respective to the value reported in the present study. In another study in Iran, the ASRs of GC per 100,000 population were described as 17.96 (in men) and 8.73 (in women) in Shahrud, a city in the north-east of Iran, from 2001 to 2010,[25] which were again lower than our values. In the central province of Qom, the reported APC of 8.08 for all cancers in women showed a significantly increasing trend from 2004 to 2008.[26] In Kermanshah, the southern neighbor province to Kurdistan, ASR of GC per 100,000 population was recorded as 9.2 during 1993–2007, showing a notably lower value than the one observed in the present study.[27] The estimations revealed an annual decrease of 0.28 in the incidence of GC in Kermanshah province.[27] In addition, the trend of noncardial GC rendered an annual decrease of 3.5% in a study performed in the Netherlands during 1973–2011.[17]

ASIRs of GC in men and women were the highest in 2008. Probable reason for this issue may be more accurate registration of cancer cases by the local registry center or due to true increasing incidence in GC.

There have been no studies divulging the risk factors of GC in Kurdistan province. Nevertheless, and based on the studies performed in other regions of Iran, the possible GC risk factors include excessive salt consumption,[28] consuming red-meat rich diets,[28] smoking,[29] obesity,[4] Helicobacter pylori-contaminated water,[30] tooth implanting at younger ages,[31] excessive use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,[1] and alcohol abuse.[28],[32] In a study in Sanandaj city, the capital of Kurdistan province, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was reported as 64.2% in children aged 4 months–15 years old.[33] In a study by Yazdanpanah et al. in 2006, the prevalence of H. pylori in Kurdistan general population was estimated as 36.5%, rendering a considerably lower ratio than other regions of Iran.[34] Regarding the high incidence of GC and relatively low prevalence of H. pylori in our province, the possible roles of other important contributing factors should be considered in the elevated risk of GC in Kurdistan. Furthermore, the relatively high exposition to the above-mentioned risk factors may in part explain the higher occurrence of GC in men respective to women. From reasons underlying the decreasing trend observed in the incidence of GC in Kurdistan province, which was in parallel to the decreasing trend reported in the other regions of Iran and other countries, may be improved general health status as well as more accessibility to healthy foods during recent years.[5],[7] In a study by Balakrishnan et al., improvements in food production and preservation methods, as well as decline in H. pylori infection, have been noted to participate in the lower incidence of GC. On the other hand, smoking is still a preventable risk factor of GC.[35]

There are some limitations in the present study. First, the quality assessment of cancer registration centers has not been validated in Iran and Kurdistan province as well.[5],[36] This fact escalates the risk of misclassification bias due to errors in recording patients' data in the registry databases.[6],[7],[8],[37],[38] Furthermore, a number of patients in our province might have referred to the neighbor provinces such as Hamedan and Zanjan or to Tehran, the capital, which benefit from more sophisticated diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. These patients might not be reported to the cancer registry center of Kurdiastan province, leading to underreporting of GC cases.[6],[7],[36]

It is advisable to conduct case–control studies addressing the etiological factors contributing to the risk of GC in Kurdistan province.[7] Furthermore, it is recommended to assess the quality of patient registration and data recording processes in local cancer registries across Iran. It is also suggested to reevaluate the data provided here, considering the cohort and age effects.


  Conclusion Top


The incidence of GC showed nonsignificant and significant decreasing trends in women and men in Kurdistan province, respectively. Despite such decreasing trends, the Kurdistan province is still considered as one of the regions with high incidence of GC in Iran. Therefore, it is necessary to implement screening programs in the province to early diagnose GC.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran (Grant number: 1.2926). This study was conducted in compliance with the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran, with the ethical code IR.ARAKMU.REC.1394.384.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran. (Grant number: 1.2926).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F. Gastric cancer: Descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:700-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Nikbakhsh N, Sadeghi MV, Ramzani E, Moudi S, Bijani A, Yousefi R, et al. Efficacy of olanzapine in symptom relief and quality of life in gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Res Med Sci 2016;21:88.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:524-48.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hassanzadeh J, Moradzadeh R, Rajaee Fard A, Tahmasebi S, Golmohammadi P. A comparison of case-control and case-only designs to investigate gene-environment interactions using breast cancer data. Iran J Med Sci 2012;37:112-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Moradzadeh R, Golmohammadi P, Ghaitasi B, Nadrian H, Najafi A. Incidence of esophageal cancer in Iran, a population-based study: 2001-2015. J Gastrointest Cancer 2019;50:507-12.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Moradzadeh R, Golmohammadi P, Kazemi-Galougahi MH, Sartipi M, Sharfi H, Ahmadpour M. Distribution of breast cancer risk factors in two groups of healthy people referral to cancer registry and Shahid Mottahari center. Data Brief 2018;19:988-91.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, Ghiasvand R, Noori-Daloii MR, Holakouie-Naieni K. Misclassification adjustment of family history of breast cancer in a case-control study: A Bayesian approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:8221-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nagel G, Stafoggia M, Pedersen M, Andersen ZJ, Galassi C, Munkenast J, et al. Air pollution and incidence of cancers of the stomach and the upper aerodigestive tract in the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). Int J Cancer 2018;143:1632-43.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Modirian M, Rahimzadeh S, Cheraghi Z, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Rezaei N, Tohidinik HR, et al. Burden of cancers in Iran from 1990 to 2010: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Arch Iran Med 2015;18:629-37.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cancer Registry Office. Health Deputy. Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences Population-Based Cancer Data in Kurdistan Province. Iran: Cancer Registry Office; 2001-2014.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Death Registry Office. Health Deputy. Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. Population-Based Death Data in Kurdistan Province. Iran: Death Registry Office; 2001-2014.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Consonni D, Coviello E, Buzzoni C, Mensi C. A command to calculate age-standardized rates with efficient interval estimation. Stata J 2012;12:688-701.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
McGahan CE, Linn K, Guno P, Johnson H, Coldman AJ, Spinelli JJ, et al. Cancer in first nations people living in British Columbia, Canada: An analysis of incidence and survival from 1993 to 2010. Cancer Causes Control 2017;28:1105-16.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression program. Version 4.5.0.1; 2017. Available from: http://www.surveillance.cancer.gov. [Last accesed on 2019 Oct 27].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000;19:335-51.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Holster IL, Aarts MJ, Tjwa ET, Lemmens VE, Kuipers EJ. Trend breaks in incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer in the Netherlands. Cancer Epidemiol 2014;38:9-15.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Vakili M, Pirdehghan A, Adimi M, Sadeghian M, Akhondi M. Epidemiology and trend of cancer in Yazd, a central province of Iran, 2005-2009. J Res Health Sci 2014;14:210-3.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Roshandel G, Boreiri M, Sadjadi A, Malekzadeh R. A diversity of cancer incidence and mortality in West Asian populations. Ann Glob Health 2014;80:346-57.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Salimzadeh H, Delavari F, Sauvaget C, Rezaee N, Delavari A, Kompani F, et al. Annual trends of gastrointestinal cancers mortality in Iran during 1990-2015; NASBOD study. Arch Iran Med 2018;21:46-55.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Boffetta P, Islami F. Cancer in low- and medium-income countries. Ann Glob Health 2014;80:345.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Atrkar-Roushan Z, Kazemnejad A, Mansour-Ghanaei F, Zayeri F. Trend analysis of gastrointestinal cancer incidences in Guilan province: Comparing rates over 15 years. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:7587-93.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Somi MH, Golzari M, Farhang S, Naghashi S, Abdollahi L. Gastrointestinal cancer incidence in East Azerbaijan, Iran: Update on 5 year incidence and trends. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:3945-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Amori N, Aghajani M, Asgarian FS, Jazayeri M. Epidemiology and trend of common cancers in Iran (2004-2008). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017;26:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Fateh M, Emamian MH. Cancer incidence and trend analysis in Shahroud, Iran, 2000 – 2010. Iran J Cancer Prev 2013;6:85-94.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rafiemanesh H, Rajaei-Behbahani N, Khani Y, Hosseini S, Pournamdar Z, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, et al. Incidence trend and epidemiology of common cancers in the center of Iran. Glob J Health Sci 2015;8:146-55.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Najafi F, Mozaffari HR, Karami M, Izadi B, Tavvafzadeh R, Pasdar Y. Trends in incidence of gastrointestinal tract cancers in Western Iran, 1993-2007. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2011;13:805-10.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Pourfarzi F, Whelan A, Kaldor J, Malekzadeh R. The role of diet and other environmental factors in the causation of gastric cancer in Iran – A population based study. Int J Cancer 2009;125:1953-60.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Praud D, Rota M, Pelucchi C, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Galeone C, et al. Cigarette smoking and gastric cancer in the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project. Eur J Cancer Prev 2018;27:124-33.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Helicobacter and Cancer Collaborative Group. Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori: A combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. Gut 2001;49:347-53.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Shakeri R, Malekzadeh R, Etemadi A, Nasrollahzadeh D, Abedi-Ardekani B, Khoshnia M, et al. Association of tooth loss and oral hygiene with risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6:477-82.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Rota M, Pelucchi C, Bertuccio P, Matsuo K, Zhang ZF, Ito H, et al. Alcohol consumption and gastric cancer risk-A pooled analysis within the StoP project consortium. Int J Cancer 2017;141:1950-62.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Jafar S, Jalil A, Soheila N, Sirous S. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in children, a population-based cross-sectional study in West Iran. Iran J Pediatr 2013;23:13-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Yazdanpanah K, Rahimi E, Sharifian A, Eishi A. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in Kurdistan Province, 2006. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 2009;14:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Balakrishnan M, George R, Sharma A, Graham DY. Changing trends in stomach cancer Throughout the World. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017;19:36.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Moradzadeh R, Anoushirvani AA. Trend of gastric cancer incidence in an area located in the center of Iran: 2009-2014. J Gastrointest Cancer 2019.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, Nadrian H, Gustafson P, McCandless LC. The impact of maternal smoking during pregnancy on childhood asthma: Adjusted for exposure misclassification; results from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2011-2012. Ann Epidemiol 2018;28:697-703.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Ghiasvand R, Baghfalaki T, Nadrian H, Holakouie-Naieni K. Impact of age at menarche on breast cancer: The assessment of recall bias. Arch Iran Med 2019;22:65-70.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed502    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded87    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal