Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 93
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Res Med Sci 2018,  23:24

Association between oral lichen planus and Epstein–Barr virus in Iranian patients


1 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Royan Institute for Biotechnology, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission11-Jun-2017
Date of Decision04-Sep-2017
Date of Acceptance20-Dec-2017
Date of Web Publication27-Mar-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Matin Shariati
Unit 5, No. 68, Shafagh Blind Alley, Stephen's Chapel Alley, West Nazar Street, Isfahan 81757-93483
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_438_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common mucocutaneous disease with malignant transformation potential. Several etiologies such as humoral, autoimmunity, and viral infections might play a role, but still there is no definite etiology for this disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) genome in Iranian patients with OLP as compared to people with normal mucosa. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out on a case group including 38 tissue specimens of patients with histopathological confirmation of OLP and a control group including 38 samples of healthy mucosa. All samples were examined by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to determine the DNA of EBV. Results: Twenty-two (57.9%) female samples and 16 (42.1%) male samples with OLP were randomly selected as the case group, and 20 (52.6%) female samples and 18 (47.4%) male samples with healthy mucosa as the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of EBV positivity between the case (15.8%) and the control groups (P < 0.05); in the case group, three female samples (13.6%) and three male samples (18.8%) were infected with EBV; the difference between the genders was not statistically significant (P = 0.50). Conclusion: Results emphasized that EBV genome was significantly higher among Iranian patients with OLP so antiviral therapy might be helpful.

Keywords: Epstein–Barr virus infections, oral lichen planus, polymerase chain reaction


How to cite this article:
Shariati M, Mokhtari M, Masoudifar A. Association between oral lichen planus and Epstein–Barr virus in Iranian patients. J Res Med Sci 2018;23:24

How to cite this URL:
Shariati M, Mokhtari M, Masoudifar A. Association between oral lichen planus and Epstein–Barr virus in Iranian patients. J Res Med Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 14];23:24. Available from: http://www.jmsjournal.net/text.asp?2018/23/1/24/228588




  Introduction Top


Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common mucocutaneous disease with malignant transformation potential. It is a chronic mucocutaneous disease without a definite etiology but humoral, viral, environmental, and genetic factors might be important. OLP is relatively prevalent, affecting 0.5%–2.2% of the general population. The mean age of patients is about 55 years, and its prevalence is higher among women.[1]

OLP is a white lace-like pattern that occurs predominantly in cheeks and has different clinical types, including reticular, papular, plaque, bullous, erosive, and sometimes it is wounded.[2]

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpes virus that can affect anyone from childhood. The virus is an opportunistic pathogen in immune-compromised patients.[3] Infection with EBV is normally transmitted from one person to another through contact with infected body fluids including infectious saliva, sexual contact, and breastfeeding.[4],[5] In the past years, Pederson [6] examined EBV DNA in some samples of OLP and showed that EBV might be involved in the pathogenesis of some oral lesions. In another study, EBV was found in 26.1% of OLP patients as well as in 7.3% of the control group.[7]

Several prospective studies [8],[9] have reported that there is a risk of malignancy in OLP. Three studies, one of which conducted in Sweden, showed clear diagnostic criteria of the risk of OLP becoming the SCC.[10],[11] Therefore, if OLP, especially the ulcerative type, has a potential to become malignant, it can be considered a major source of oral cancer in many regions of the world.[12]

Recent reports say that immunological factors are involved in the etiology of this disease. However, the etiology of lichen planus is still generally unknown.[13] The antigen responsible for lichen planus has not been found yet, but viral factors are proposed as its etiologic factors.[6] For example, EBV is associated with benign and malignant diseases of the head and neck, but OLP sometimes shows malignant transformation, too.[14],[15]

Oral malignancies diagnosis in comparison to malignancies of other parts of the body is very critical due to rapid metastasis and early death of patients. There are certain oral conditions known as premalignant condition including lichen planus, and an early diagnosis of such conditions and follow-ups of these lesions is highly crucial. Because of the tendency to malignancy and the risks involved in such changes, OLP has a crucial role in oral and dentistry diseases.[3],[16]

EBV is associated with a wide range of human infective diseases including infectious mononucleosis, Hodgkin's lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.[17],[18] The progress of EBV-related neoplasms is strongly associated with environmental factors and genetic disruption for regulating patient immune system.[19] The virus is a type of herpes virus with double-stranded DNA and is prevalent among the normal population. About 90% of adults have EBV Antibodies. In fact, EBV infection targets two types of cells: (1) oropharyngeal epithelium or salivary glands and (2) B-lymphocytes.[20]

The objectives of this study include determination of the relative frequency of EBV genotype in Iranian patients with OLP as well as non-OLP cases and comparing the two groups. Moreover, the association between EBV frequency and the patients' age will be studied in OLP patients. Furthermore, the relative frequency of EBV in OLP cases will be determined and compared between two genders. If such correlations are found, in addition to epidemiological value, antiviral medicine can be used as a treatment for lichen planus and even as prophylaxis for the prevention of premalignant lesions in high-risk cases.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study is a case–control descriptive analysis that was carried out on the patients of Al-Zahra hospital in the city of Isfahan from 2006 to 2016. Participants were selected using randomized simple sampling method, and there was no limitation for the patients' age and gender. All the selected patients in the study were suffering from oral lesions with OLP criteria. The minimum sample size was calculated as 38 using the formula where Z1 was 95% or 1.64 and Z2 was 75% or 0.67. P1 and P2, which were estimates of the relative frequency of EBV genotype in Iranian OLP patients and non-OLP individuals, were about 26% and 7%, respectively.[5] The control group had the same size as the case group. In total, there were 78 participants in the study.

The clinical history of the selected samples was recorded using their medical profiles in hospital archives to collect information about their clinical history of oral lesions confirmed by biopsy. Furthermore, the demographic data of the selected samples were recorded. All the samples with confirmed OLP were selected as the case group. Samples that had received some treatment during the last 3 months before collection of the mucosa sample, including topical, oral, or IV treatments for EBV were excluded. Also having any simultaneous diseases or malignancies and the small size of the paraffin block which would not be appropriate for DNA extraction were other exclusion criteria. Moreover, the healthy oral mucosa was the criterion for the control group. The exclusion criteria for the control group were having simultaneous diseases or malignancies and the small size of the paraffin block which would not be appropriate for DNA extraction.

Once OLP and healthy oral mucosa were diagnosed in the stabilized blocks of the tissue samples for both groups, again by the pathologist researcher, the samples were examined with formalin using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to determine the DNA of EBV. In this study, PCR method was used to determine the presence of virus genotypes, which are among the most sensitive and specific methods of virus diagnosis. To carry out this study, a CORBETT device made in Australia and a CINNAGEN kit made in Iran with a sensitivity of up to 30 copy/mg were used. The PCR method was based on the procedure described by SinaClon BioScience Company. According to the description:

CinnaGen EBV PCR detection kit is destined for the qualitative detection of EBV DNA in infected samples by the method of PCR. CinnaGen EBV PCR detection kit may be used in clinical medicine to detect EBV DNA. The reagent of ready to use mix is an optimized 1X PCR mixture of Taq DNA Polymerase (recombinant), PCR buffer, MgCl2, dNTPs, and primers. Primer set is specified to the highly specific repetitive region of BLLF1 gene. This primer set allows for detection of 30 copies of EBV.

The mix contains all the components for PCR expect DNA. In addition, sterile water, PCR grade mineral oil, and positive control have supplied. Positive control tube contains a plasmid with cloned PCR fragment which indicates a successfully performed reaction. Blue and ready to load mix does not need any loading dye for electrophoresis. About 256 bp PCR products indicate a positive reaction.

This kit is sufficient for 50 amplification reactions of 25 μl volume each (http://www.sinaclon.com/product-114-Epstein --Barr-virus-PCR-Detection-kit-EBV-Kit).

Based on the guidelines of the company, the kit was taken out, and the tubes were unfrozen and put on ice. The new PCR tubes were labeled for amplification reaction for test, positive and negative control. Then, PCR MIX 20 μl and Taq DNA polymerase 0.2 μl was added to each tube on ice. Furthermore, one drop (20–25 μl) of mineral oil was added to each tube when needed. The reactions' tubes were capped, and the tube tray was placed in a resealable plastic bag, and the bag was securely sealed. The next steps were done at preamplification 1, specimen and control preparation area by adding 5 μl DNA, using a specified pipette for DNA sampling. The tubes were closed, and the mixtures were microfuged for 3–5 s. Then, the tubes were transferred to preheated thermocycler and the program was started.

Data were analyzed using Chi-square, Independent t-test, Fisher's exact test, and Mann–Whitney U-test. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS-20 software (Armonk, NY:IBM Corp). The significant level for all the statistical tests was set at 0.05.


  Results Top


The case group (patients with OLP) included 22 (57.9%) female samples and 16 (42.1%) male samples (n = 38) and the control group included 20 (52.6%) female samples and 18 (47.4%) male samples (n = 38) [Table 1]. Chi-square test showed that the frequency distribution of gender was not significantly different between both groups (P = 0.64). All the demographic characteristic of the samples are shown in [Table 1]. In the case group, 6 samples (15.8%) had EBV infection, but none of the samples in the control group had EBV infection, and Fisher's exact test showed that EBV infection in the case group was significantly higher than the control group (P = 0.01) [Table 2]. In the case group, 3 female samples (13.6%) and 3 male samples (18.8%) were infected with EBV, and Fisher's exact test showed that EBV infection among women and men in the case group was not significantly different (P = 0.50) [Table 3]. The mean age of the EBV infection negative patients in the case group was 46.5, and of the EBV infection positive patients was 44.8 years, and independent t-test showed no significant difference between them (P = 0.61) [Table 4].
Table 1: Average age and gender distribution in the two groups

Click here to view
Table 2: The frequency of Epstein–Barr virus in oral lichen planus patients and the control group

Click here to view
Table 3: The frequency of Epstein–Barr virus infection in the case group by gender

Click here to view
Table 4: Mean age of the case group based on Epstein – Barr virus infection

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Early discovery of malignant and dysplastic lesions has always been an important aim. Early diagnosis and treatment can immune patients from irreparable damages. Since lichen planus is a lesion with occasionally malignant changes, and more importantly, it might be considered premalignant and malignant in the differential diagnosis of the lesions,[1],[3] on one hand, and the infection with EBV exists in all societies,[21] even among people living in forlorn and isolated places such as Melanesia and Amazonian plateau,[22] on the other hand, this study was carried out to investigate the relationship between EBV and OLP.

A study in Esfahan Dentistry School found an increase in the number of patients with OLP in recent years. This increase might be related to the increase in population or the change in people's and dentists' attitudes toward the disease and its high tendency to malignant changes. The study also showed the average age of patients with OLP had been lowered.[23]

There are few studies on the frequency and epidemic changes of OLP in Iran. Esmaily et al.[24] study in Tehran that showed the prevalence of OLP in men, especially in their 30s. Khalili and Shojaee [25] study, also in Tehran, reported the average age for the emergence of the disease is 42 years in an age range of 5–83 years old. Pakfetrat et al. study [26] in Mashhad also reported an average age of 41.16 for OLP patients, 64.9% of whom were females. In 2010, a study in Isfahan [23] showed that the most prevalence of OLP is at the age of 41–50 years of age and it is more prevalent among women (64.7%).

Some authors say that OLP is a malignant transformation, but this is a questionable statement.[14],[27],[28] In 2002, a study showed the presence of EBV in oral malignant lesions and OLP.[6] In 2011, a study in Turkey [29] investigated the prevalence of EBV, herpes simplex virus (HSV), and human papillomaviruses (HPV) 16 in 65 OLP cases and found that the risk for EBV and HPV among OLP patients is very high, but not the risk for HSV. The study concluded that OLP patients must be checked for being infected with both EBV and HPV because these two viruses have potential oncogenicity.

It is also useful to mention that studies in the past years have reported the association between the degree of dysplasia in leukoplakia and prevalence of EBV.[30],[31],[32] On the other hand, some studies used PRC method on OSCC patients but found no significant difference in the prevalence of EBV between OLP patients and control groups.[33],[34]

Few studies have been conducted in Iran about the relation between EBV virus and OLP and conducted studies in other countries have been performed on small samples;[35] they have eventually recommended performing further studies on larger sample sizes. Furthermore, some of the previous studies have not used the modern methods of PCR, and they have performed their studies using serologic or immunohistochemistry methods.[29] Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate this matter in Isfahan, Iran, using the modern method of DNA detect (PCR).

The purpose of this study was to examine the presence of EBV in patients with OLP in comparison with healthy mucosa individuals. Considering the fact that various viruses can be found in the lichen planus, this study discussed the presence of common EBV in OLP. Once such correlation is found, in addition to epidemiological value, antiviral medicine can be used as a treatment for lichen planus and even as prophylaxis for the prevention of premalignant lesions in high-risk cases.

The PCR method was used in the present study to determine the presence of virus genotypes is one of the most sensitive and specific methods of virus diagnosis. Although other studies [35] found no significant difference in the EBV prevalence between OLP and controls using the same method; this study showed that EBV infection in OLP group was significantly higher than the control group. In fact, our results suggested that EBV may be involved in the pathogenesis of OLP.

We recommend further studies in the future on the EBV oncogenic potential, to detect this virus in OLP cases. Furthermore, long-term follow-ups are recommended on the lesions that are found to be EBV-positive.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Burket LW, Greenberg MS, Glick M, Ship JA. Burket's Oral Medicine. 11th ed. New York: PMPH-USA; 2008. p. 89-95.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Katta R. Lichen planus. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:3319-24, 3327-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
de Sousa FA, Paradella HC. Malignant potential of oral lichen planus: A meta-analysis. J Dent Sci 2009;24:194-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Walling DM. Oral hairy leukoplakia: An Epstein-Barr virus-associated disease of patients with HIV. Res Initiat Treat Action 2000;6:10-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Milagres A, Dias EP, Tavares Ddos S, Cavalcante RM, Dantas VA, de Oliveira SP, et al. Prevalence of oral hairy leukoplakia and epithelial infection by Epstein-Barr virus in pregnant women and diabetes mellitus patients – Cytopathologic and molecular study. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007;102:159-64.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pedersen A. Abnormal EBV immune status in oral lichen planus. Oral Dis 1996;2:125-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sand LP, Jalouli J, Larsson PA, Hirsch JM. Prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus in oral squamous cell carcinoma, oral lichen planus, and normal oral mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:586-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Camisa C, Hamaty FG, Gay JD. Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue arising in lichen planus: A case report and review of the literature. Cutis 1998;62:175-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chainani-Wu N, Silverman S Jr., Lozada-Nur F, Mayer P, Watson JJ. Oral lichen planus: Patient profile, disease progression and treatment responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:901-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gandolfo S, Richiardi L, Carrozzo M, Broccoletti R, Carbone M, Pagano M, et al. Risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma in 402 patients with oral lichen planus: A follow-up study in an Italian population. Oral Oncol 2004;40:77-83.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rödström PO, Jontell M, Mattsson U, Holmberg E. Cancer and oral lichen planus in a Swedish population. Oral Oncol 2004;40:131-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kaplan I, Ventura-Sharabi Y, Gal G, Calderon S, Anavi Y. The dynamics of oral lichen planus: A retrospective clinicopathological study. Head Neck Pathol 2012;6:178-83.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gorouhi F, Davari P, Fazel N. Cutaneous and mucosal lichen planus: A comprehensive review of clinical subtypes, risk factors, diagnosis, and prognosis. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:742826.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Markopoulos AK, Antoniades D, Papanayotou P, Trigonidis G. Malignant potential of oral lichen planus; a follow-up study of 326 patients. Oral Oncol 1997;33:263-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mignogna MD, Lo Muzio L, Lo Russo L, Fedele S, Ruoppo E, Bucci E, et al. Clinical guidelines in early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma arising in oral lichen planus: A 5-year experience. Oral Oncol 2001;37:262-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bokor-Bratic M, Picuric I. The prevalence of precancerous oral lesion: Oral lichen planus. Arch Oncol 2001;9:107-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Goldenberg D, Benoit NE, Begum S, Westra WH, Cohen Y, Koch WM, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in head and neck cancer assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1027-31.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Pietersma F, Piriou E, van Baarle D. Immune surveillance of EBV-infected B cells and the development of non-Hodgkin lymphomas in immunocompromised patients. Leuk Lymphoma 2008;49:1028-41.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kushekhar K, van den Berg A, Nolte I, Hepkema B, Visser L, Diepstra A, et al. Genetic associations in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic review and insights into susceptibility mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:2737-47.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Syrjänen S. Viral infections in oral mucosa. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:17-31.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Tischendorf P, Shramek GJ, Balagtas RC, Deinhardt F, Knospe WH, Noble GR, et al. Development and persistence of immunity to Epstein-Barr virus in man. J Infect Dis 1970;122:401-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lang DJ, Garruto RM, Gajdusek DC. Early acquisition of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus antibody in several isolated Melanesian populations. Am J Epidemiol 1977;105:480-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Shirani A, Razavi S, Khazaei S, Akhavan Khaleghi M, Haerian A. Evaluation of oral lichen planus frequency in patients referred to the Oral Pathology Department of Isfahan School of Dentistry during the last two decades (1988-2008). J Isfahan Dent Sch 2010;6:276-82.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Esmaily N, Barzegarri M, Rezaee M. Prevalence a clinical manifestation at lichen planus: Case reports 120 cases. J Skin Dis 2003;8:110-4.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Khalili M, Shojaee M. A retrospective study of oral lichen planus in oral pathology department Tehran University of Medical Science (1968-2002). J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci 2006;19:45-52.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Pakfetrat A, Basir Shabestari S, Falaki F. Five year clinical and epidemiologic findings of oral lichen planus patients referred to oral medicine department of Mashhad dental school – Iran. J Mashhad Dent Sch 2008;32:195-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
van der Meij EH, Schepman KP, Smeele LE, van der Wal JE, Bezemer PD, van der Waal I, et al. Areview of the recent literature regarding malignant transformation of oral lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:307-10.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lozada-Nur F, Miranda C. Oral lichen planus: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and associated diseases. Semin Cutan Med Surg 1997;16:273-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Yildirim B, Sengüven B, Demir C. Prevalence of herpes simplex, Epstein Barr and human papilloma viruses in oral lichen planus. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e170-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Mao EJ, Smith CJ. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in oral smears from healthy individuals and patients with squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 1993;22:12-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
D'Costa J, Saranath D, Sanghvi V, Mehta AR. Epstein-Barr virus in tobacco-induced oral cancers and oral lesions in patients from India. J Oral Pathol Med 1998;27:78-82.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Horiuchi K, Mishima K, Ichijima K, Sugimura M, Ishida T, Kirita T, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in the proliferative diseases of squamous epithelium in the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
van Heerden WE, van Rensburg EJ, Engelbrecht S, Raubenheimer EJ. Prevalence of EBV in oral squamous cell carcinomas in young patients. Anticancer Res 1995;15:2335-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Mizugaki Y, Sugawara Y, Shinozaki F, Takada K. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in oral papilloma. Jpn J Cancer Res 1998;89:604-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Sahebjamee M, Eslami M, Jahanzad I, Babaee M, Kharazani Tafreshi N. Presence of Epstein-Barr virus in oral lichen planus and normal oral mucosa. Iran J Public Health 2007;36:92-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Author's Con...
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed496    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded71    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal