Tissue plasminogen activator; identifying major barriers related to intravenous injection in ischemic acute cerebral infraction
Fariborz Khorvash1, Fatemeh Heidary2, Mohammad Saadatnia1, Ahmad Chitsaz1, Zahra Tolou-Ghamari3
1 Department of Neurology; Isfahan Neuroscience Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Isfahan Neuroscience Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Isfahan Kidney Transplantation Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
|Date of Submission||10-Feb-2016|
|Date of Decision||16-Jul-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||23-Nov-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||16-Feb-2017|
Isfahan Kidney Transplantation Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: According to previous publications, in patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction, thrombolytic therapy using intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) necessitates precise documentation of symptoms' onset. The aim of this study was to identify major barriers related to the IV-tPA injection in such patients. Materials and Methods: Between the year 2014-2015, patients with definitive diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction (n = 180) who attended the neurology ward located at the Isfahan Alzahra Hospital were studied. To investigate barriers related to door to IV-tPA needle time, personal reasons, and criteria for inclusion or exclusion of patients, three questionnaire forms were designed based on the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications or contraindications. Results: The mean age of males versus females was 60 versus 77.5 years (ranged 23–93 vs. 29–70 years), respectively. Out of total population, only 10.7% transferred to hospital in <4.5 h after the onset of symptoms. Regarding to eligibility for IV-tPA, 68.9% of total population have had criteria for such treatment. Concerning to both items such as transferring to hospital in <4.5 h after the onset of symptoms and eligibility for IV-tPA, only 6.6% of total population met the criteria for such management. There was ignorance or inattention to symptoms in 75% of population studied. There was a mean of 195.92 ± 6.65 min (182.8–209.04 min) for door to IV-tPA needle time. Conclusion: Despite the international guidelines for IV-tPA injection within 3–4.5 h of ischemic stroke symptoms' onset, the results of this study revealed that falling time due to ignorance of symptoms, literacy, and living alone might need further attention. As a result, to decrease death and disability, educational programs related to the symptoms' onset by consultant neurologist in Isfahan/Iran seem to be advantageous.
Keywords: Cerebral infarction, injection barriers, ischemic stroke, tissue plasminogen activator
|How to cite this article:|
Khorvash F, Heidary F, Saadatnia M, Chitsaz A, Tolou-Ghamari Z. Tissue plasminogen activator; identifying major barriers related to intravenous injection in ischemic acute cerebral infraction. J Res Med Sci 2017;22:19
|How to cite this URL:|
Khorvash F, Heidary F, Saadatnia M, Chitsaz A, Tolou-Ghamari Z. Tissue plasminogen activator; identifying major barriers related to intravenous injection in ischemic acute cerebral infraction. J Res Med Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Jan 25];22:19. Available from: http://www.jmsjournal.net/text.asp?2017/22/1/19/200318
| Introduction|| |
According to the previous publications, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) could be mentioned as the most reason of events related to death and disability., In fact, acute focal cerebral ischemia and sequential dynamism disaster are convoyed by neuronal death in the parts of brain that cerebral blood flow was reduced.,,,
Due to rising in the world's prevalence and incidence of stroke, its global importance is increasing extremely., Up-to-date epidemiological studies specified that 16.9 million people suffer from stroke each year, which indicates a global incidence of 258/100,000 in each year. However, the number of survivors almost doubled among 1990 and 2010, but there are 5.9 million stroke-associated decreases globally each year., Death related to stroke excessively affects blacks, and this inequality is established across all categories of stroke. Age and stroke severity are the main factors of outcomes. Poststroke complications include motor handicaps, dementia, depression, fatigue, and a high risk of early rehospitalization.
The serine protease, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), as a key enzyme related to fibrinolytic pathway, is involved in disruption of blood clots. Recombinant tPA (rtPA) is a form of tPA that is manufactured by the recombinant biotechnology methods. To achieve reperfusion, intravenous-rtPA (IV-rtPA) is given to the patients to cut the zymogen plasminogen peptide bond into the serine protease plasmin. In addition, tPA plays a role in cell migration and tissue remodeling. Hyper- and hypo-fibrinolysis could be caused by increased or decreased activity which can result in excessive bleeding, thrombosis, or embolism.,,,, Even though the prescription of tPA for AIS has been increased in the current years, the total degree of its use remains to be low.
Regarding the accurate time for understanding IV-rtPA prescription, the precise records of the last known normal time are vital to confirm an optimum management for stroke patients.
Although publication in 2012 stated that IV-rtPA given within 6 h of stroke onset, another publication in 2013 recommended valuable early administration within 0–3 h, destructive later prescription of 3–4.5 h, and again beneficial of administration of 4.5–6 h.,, Recent approaches mentioned that IV-rtPA therapy could be administered to cautiously nominated patients who can be treated within 4.5 h of AIS onset. Related to the populations that neurologic signs are revealed on awakening (wake-up stroke), they usually are not given IV-rtPA because of the doubt about the time of stroke onset.
Previous studies have shown that IV-rtPA dosed at 0.9 mg/kg with a maximum of 90 mg seems to be safe and effective. Because of the racial variances in blood coagulation-fibrinolysis features, Asian patients might need lower dosage of drug., The current international guidelines by the American Stroke Association have established that IV-rtPA should only be given within 4.5 h of stroke onset, and door to needle time should be <60 min, with a goal of 40 min.
Because of time-restriction-injection for IV-rtPA, up to now, there is not any proper guideline associated to the barriers in the IV-rtPA pharmacotherapy approach within the Iranian population of patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the barriers related to the use of IV-rtPA in such population.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Between 2014 and 2015, patients with definitive diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction who attended the neurology ward located at the Isfahan Alzahra Hospital (n = 180) were studied.
The investigation was approved by the Research Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Grant No of 393522). Approach for injection criteria was based on the international guidelines of “Stroke Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria” for injection of IV-rtPA. The barriers related to “door to IV-rtPA needle time” were noted into checklist that was divided into three parts. The first part was included age, sex, date of admission, and literacy for reading and writing. The second part was involved as prehospital information such as onset of symptoms, transfer to hospital (private car/ambulance), arrival time, and the causes of delay to hospital (unavailability of vehicles, ignorance of the symptoms, lack of correct diagnosis, far from hospital, and living alone). The third part was comprised stroke inclusion/exclusion criteria.,,,,,,,,,, [Flowchart 1] shows the barriers for IV-rtPA “door to needle” time taken for each individual patient that was filled by questioner.
All statistical analyses were attempted using the SPSS statistical software package (version 23.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
| Results|| |
Of the total population referred to hospital, 47.2% were females. As shown in [Figure 1], with a mean of 60 years, the minimum and maximum age of females was 29 and 70 years, respectively. Age-related stroke in 75% of females was before the age of 70, in which 31.4% of females ranged from 30 to 60 years.
The mean age of males was 77.5 years (ranged from 23 to 93 years). Age-related stroke in 81% of males ranged from 70 to 90 years [Figure 2]. [Table 1] shows the frequency of patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA), associated to the eligibility for intravenous tPA (IV-tPA) injection. Related to transferring to hospital, 89.3% of patients were not transferred in proper time.
|Table 1: Distribution of patients eligibility for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator injection|
Click here to view
Regarding eligibility for IV-tPA, 68.9% of total population has had criteria for such treatment. Concerning to both items such as transferring to hospital in <4.5 h after the onset of symptoms and eligibility for IV-tPA, only 6.6% of total population met the criteria for such management [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Distribution of reasons for delay from prehospital to hospital|
Click here to view
[Table 2] shows distribution of inclusion/exclusion criteria items for IV-tPA Injection. There was no evidence related to progressing or worsening of stroke symptoms in 92.2% (n = 166). Related to other neurological deficit, 179 patients did not show any related signs or symptoms. In the beginning of CVA symptoms' onset, 22 out of 180 or 12.2% of patients presented seizures. There was history of intracranial hemorrhage, brain aneurysm, vascular malformation, brain tumor, and brain hemorrhage in 7.8% of patients. There was no sign or symptom related to subarachnoid hemorrhage in 179 patients (99.9%). Only in 4 patients, 2.2% blood glucose was <50 or more than 400 (mg/dl). There was no evidence connected to gastrointestinal hemorrhage or urinary tract problems in 89.9%. Prothrombin time of >15 or internal normalized ratio of prothrombin time of >1.5 was noted in 22 of 180 patients (12.2%). There was not any history of recent anticoagulant therapy in 88.9% of population studied. Only 1.7% (n = 3) had platelet of more than 100,000 mm 3. There was no history of trauma or CVA in 92.2%. The previous surgery or blood pressure of ≥185/10 mmHg was reported in 0.6% and 22%, respectively [Figure 4].
|Table 2: Frequently distribution of inclusion/exclusion criteria items for IV-tPA injection|
Click here to view
[Table 3] shows the mean of “door to needle tPA” time taken for population studied. The mean time associated to patients' entry into hospital until to be visited by neurologist was with a mean of 195.92 ±6.65 min (182.8–209.04 min). Time taken for visiting by screen practitioner and emergency was 24.6 ± 2 min (20.7–28.5 min). Procedure related to computed tomography scan, clinical laboratory, and emergency visit was associated to the mean duration of 46.32 ± 2.39 min (41.59–51.06 min). [Figure 3] shows distribution of reasons for delay from prehospital to hospital. Out of total population, 105 mentioned that ignored stroke symptoms from the time of onset. There was lack of availability to car for transferring patients to hospital in 62 patients. Literacy or living alone has been noticed in 25 and 34 patients, respectively. There was no pay to attention to disease symptoms in 50 patients. There was difficulty related to long distance from patients' home to hospital in 48 patients. There was a lack of information linked to emergency services and lack of familiarity with the service of 115 in 2 and 18 patients, respectively. There were reasons of delay due to ignorance or inattention to stroke symptoms because of literacy in 75% of patients population studied.
|Table 3: Mean of “door to IV-tPA injection time taken” for population studied (n=180)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The result of this study confirmed a minimum age of around 25 years of life for the event of stroke (classified as acute ischemic cerebral infarction) in both genders. This is in agreement with previous publications, in which noted that changes in (1) endothelial function, (2) alterations in the blood–brain barrier, or (3) hormonal changes could be considered for such patients with young age-related stroke.,,,
Linked to clinical care for patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction, pharmacotherapy management, and device-induced reperfusion has established as optimistic management related to the both reperfusion effectiveness and 3 months functional results after AIS. Actually, IV-tPA was first approved in the United States in 1996 and shown to have a positive impact related to clinical outcome in recent years. In 2012, the stroke academic industry roundtable suggested beneficial assessment of (1) neuroprotective agents, (2) IV-tPA, and (3) emerging treatments to decrease reperfusion damage.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Henninger and Fisher reported that <10% of all patients with AIS receive intravenous thrombolysis and it has been expected that only around 7%–15% of AIS patients are qualified for acute endovascular intervention.
Investigation of barriers related to the use of IV-tPA in the treatment of patients with CVA, from prehospital to hospital, showed inattention of patients to their symptoms at the time of symptoms' onset, in which the reason in 30% was due to living lonely. There was lack of correct diagnosis noted in 33% of patients. Unavailability for a car to transform patients to a proper hospital was noted in 30%. Publication in 2015 confirmed that IV-tPA therapy could be prescribed to carefully selected patients and those could be administered within 4.5 h of AIS onset. Associated to populations that neurologic signs are exposed upon wake-up stroke typically, because of the uncertainty about the time of stroke onset, IV-rtPA should not be prescribed.
There was a mean falling time of 3.3 h within hospital (95% confidence interval of 3.0–3.5 h). A previous publication by Spokoyny et al., in 2015, highlighted the necessity for informative package associated to the determination and modification of the certain time of stroke onset, particularly at hospital without stroke expertise.
Finally, however, this study revealed barriers for door to IV-tPA injection, but its limitation could be mentioned as the lack of stroke data registry to generate standard model that could be adjustable to Isfahan/Iran health-care system.
| Conclusion|| |
Due to the ignorance of symptoms in 75% of patients, educative programs in television or other communicative media, by neurologist in terms of explaining stroke symptoms and its disaster disability consequences, should be more considered. It is also important for healthcare staff to understand the importance of protocol guidelines toward IV-tPA prescription in proper time.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Grant No, 393522).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| Authors' Contribution|| |
- FKH contributed to the conception of the work, conducting the study and revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript and agreed for all aspects of the work.
- FH contributed to the conception of the work, conducting the study and revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript and agreed for all aspects of the work.
- MS contributed to the conception of the work, conducting the study and revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript and agreed for all aspects of the work.
- AC contributed to the conception of the work, conducting the study and revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript and agreed for all aspects of the work.
- ZT contributed to the conception of the work, conducting the study and revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript and agreed for all aspects of the work.
| References|| |
Möhlenbruch MA, Bendszus M. Technical standards for the interventional treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Nervenarzt 2015;86:1209-16.
Hobohm C, Laignel F, Kacza J, Küppers-Tiedt L, Heindl M, Schneider D, et al.
Long-lasting neuronal loss following experimental focal cerebral ischemia is not affected by combined administration of tissue plasminogen activator and hyperbaric oxygen. Brain Res 2011;1417:115-26.
Béjot Y, Daubail B, Giroud M. Epidemiology of stroke and transient ischemic attacks: Current knowledge and perspectives. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2016;172:59-68.
Hsia AW, Edwards DF, Morgenstern LB, Wing JJ, Brown NC, Coles R, et al.
Racial disparities in tissue plasminogen activator treatment rate for stroke: A population-based study. Stroke 2011;42:2217-21.
Saposnik G, Guzik AK, Reeves M, Ovbiagele B, Johnston SC. Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIH Stroke Scale: SPAN-100. Neurology 2013;80:21-8.
DeMers G, Meurer WJ, Shih R, Rosenbaum S, Vilke GM. Tissue plasminogen activator and stroke: Review of the literature for the clinician. J Emerg Med 2012;43:1149-54.
Horsch AD, Dankbaar JW, van der Graaf Y, Niesten JM, van Seeters T, van der Schaaf IC, et al
. Relation between reperfusion and hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2015;57:1219-25.
Wang J, Li J, Liu Q. Association between platelet activation and fibrinolysis in acute stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 2005;384:305-9.
Fang MC, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Trends in thrombolytic use for ischemic stroke in the United States. J Hosp Med 2010;5:406-9.
Spokoyny I, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Kim AJ, Meyer BC, Karanjia NP. Accuracy of first recorded “last known normal” times of stroke code patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:2467-73.
Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo G, Sandercock P, Lindley RL, et al.
Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012;379:2364-72.
Newman D. Thrombolytics for Acute Ischemic Stroke: No Benefit Found. NNT Group. [Last retrieved on 2013 Nov 30].
Adams HP Jr. IV thrombolysis for treatment of patients with stroke upon awakening: Yes? No? Neurol Clin Pract 2015;5:296-301.
O'Carroll CB, Aguilar MI. Management of postthrombolysis hemorrhagic and orolingual angioedema complications. Neurohospitalist 2015;5:133-41.
Dharmasaroja PA, Pattaraarchachai J. Low vs. standard dose of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in treating East Asian patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurol India 2011;59:180-4.
Del Zoppo GJ, Saver JL, Jauch EC, Adams HP Jr.; American Heart Association Stroke Council. Expansion of the time window for treatment of acute ischemic stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator: A science advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009;40:2945-8.
Rost NS, Masrur S, Pervez MA, Viswanathan A, Schwamm LH. Unsuspected coagulopathy rarely prevents IV thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2009;73:1957-62.
Selim M, Kumar S, Fink J, Schlaug G, Caplan LR, Linfante I. Seizure at stroke onset: Should it be an absolute contraindication to thrombolysis? Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;14:54-7.
Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr., Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, et al.
Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:870-947.
De Smedt A, De Raedt S, Nieboer K, De Keyser J, Brouns R. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in a stroke patient treated with dabigatran. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;30:533-4.
Ganetsky M, Babu KM, Salhanick SD, Brown RS, Boyer EW. Dabigatran: Review of pharmacology and management of bleeding complications of this novel oral anticoagulant. J Med Toxicol 2011;7:281-7.
Watanabe M, Siddiqui FM, Qureshi AI. Incidence and management of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in patients on dabigatran etexilate treatment. Neurocrit Care 2012;16:203-9.
Alberts MJ, Bernstein RA, Naccarelli GV, Garcia DA. Using dabigatran in patients with stroke: A practical guide for clinicians. Stroke 2012;43:271-9.
De Silva DA, Manzano JJ, Chang HM, Wong MC. Reconsidering recent myocardial infarction as a contraindication for IV stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2011;76:1838-40.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, et al.
Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317-29.
Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-7.
Ifejika NL, Vahidy F, Aramburo-Maldonado LA, Cai C, Sline MR, Grotta JC, et al.
Acute intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy does not impact community discharge after inpatient rehabilitation. Int J Neurorehabil 2015;2. pii: 183.
Hoda MN, Siddiqui S, Herberg S, Periyasamy-Thandavan S, Bhatia K, Hafez SS, et al.
Remote ischemic perconditioning is effective alone and in combination with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator in murine model of embolic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:2794-9.
Henninger N, Fisher M. Extending the time window for endovascular and pharmacological reperfusion. Transl Stroke Res 2016;7:284-93.
Sohrabji F, Bake S, Lewis DK. Age-related changes in brain support cells: Implications for stroke severity. Neurochem Int 2013;63:291-301.
Tolou-Ghamari Z, Mazdak H. Pharmacotherapy updates of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) in acute ischemic stroke. Jentashapir J Health Res 2016;7:e36067.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]