Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 336
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Res Med Sci 2016,  21:2

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on gestational diabetes in high-risk women: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial


Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

Date of Submission03-May-2015
Date of Decision17-Oct-2015
Date of Acceptance08-Dec-2015
Date of Web Publication28-Jan-2016

Correspondence Address:
Bahar Pouya
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurdistan Medical Science University, Sanandaj
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1735-1995.175148

Clinical trial registration 14140742

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is common in pregnancy, leading to increase in the frequency of preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, neonatal bacterial vaginosis, and gestational diabetes. The current study was designed and implemented to investigate the effect of vitamin D during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy in reducing the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women who are at high risk [history of GDM, birth macrosomia, family history, and high body mass index (BMI)]. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial, 90 pregnant women who had at least one risk factor for GDM were randomized into intervention (46 participants) and control (44 participants) groups. Participants in the intervention group took 5000 units of vitamin D daily and the control group took placebo until the 26th week of pregnancy. Then the glucose challenge test (GCT) and the glucose tolerance test (GTT) were performed to evaluate GDM. Results: Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 31.28 ± 6.38 years and 29 ± 6.24 years for the intervention group and the placebo group, respectively, (P > 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences between two groups in terms of vitamin D levels and GCT (P > 0.05), and the difference was not significant. The incidence of diabetes in the intervention groups was statistically lower than in control group (11.4% vs 34.8; P < 0.01). The results showed that abnormal GCT in the placebo group was statistically higher than in intervention group (35.9% vs 10.9 P < 0.005). Conclusion: The results of the current study showed that the prescription of vitamin D supplementation in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy was effective in reducing GDM and controlling GTT and GTC.

Keywords: Diabetes, first trimester, gestational diabetes, pregnancy, Sanandaj, vitamin D


How to cite this article:
Shahgheibi S, Farhadifar F, Pouya B. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on gestational diabetes in high-risk women: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Res Med Sci 2016;21:2

How to cite this URL:
Shahgheibi S, Farhadifar F, Pouya B. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on gestational diabetes in high-risk women: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Res Med Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 9];21:2. Available from: http://www.jmsjournal.net/text.asp?2016/21/1/2/175148


  Introduction Top


Vitamin D is one of the fat-soluble vitamins, which has many functions in addition to its vital role in bone health, including prevention of cell proliferation in colorectal, prostate, and breast cancers and its role in prevention of autoimmune diseases. [1] The need for vitamin D is higher in some stages of life, which include the rapid growth of the fetus in the embryonic stage, infancy, the early stage of childhood, puberty, and pregnancy. [2],[3] Studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is common in pregnancy [4],[5] and is associated with increased incidence of preeclampsia, [6] cesarean section (C/S), [7] bacterial vaginosis, [8] and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). [9]

In addition, the reverse relationship between vitamin D concentration in serum and risk of diabetes type-II has been proved. Vitamin D has a direct effect on pancreatic beta cells and glucose metabolism, thus its level has a reverse relationship with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels. [9] Vitamin D deficiency is known to be related to blood glucose and insulin concentration alteration and target tissue sensitivity to insulin. [10] GDM is characterized by glucose intolerance in pregnancy and its pathophysiology is similar to type 2 diabetes mellitus, that is insulin tolerance and insulin insufficiency. On the other hand, GDM is associated with maternal (premature birth, infectious complications, hydramnios, hypertensive complications) and fetal (dead birth, altered fetus growth, metabolic disturbances, respiratory distress syndrome, obesity in childhood, and diabetes) complications. [11] Vitamin D deficiency is common in pregnancy and evidence shows that vitamin D causes increased sensitivity to insulin and glucose tolerance, and many researchers have shown the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and GDM, but little is known about the effect of prescribing vitamin D supplementation in preventing gestational diabetes. [12] Alzhime et al. in their study concluded that there is a relationship between vitamin D deficiency and gestational diabetes. They suggested that in order to investigate vitamin D prescription effects on gestational diabetes incidence, there is a need for intervention and prescribing vitamin D supplementation. [13] Other studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency causes insufficient secretion of insulin and other pancreatic hormones and glucose intolerance in animal and human models. [9]

Vitamin D deficiency and its effect on gestational diabetes have been investigated in various studies, however, the vitamin D dose needed for decreasing the risk of gestational diabetes is not known yet. [14] Basic epidemiologic studies have shown a relationship between vitamin D deficiency and risk of gestational diabetes and diabetes type 2. [15] Although observational studies have proved the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and increased risk of gestational diabetes, [16] a reverse relationship has been identified between vitamin D deficiency and blood glucose in other studies. [17],[18] In vivo studies on rats showed that vitamin D supplementation caused improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion, [19],[20] and in small trials vitamin D has caused blood glucose control in gestational diabetes. [20],[21]

Considering the vitamin D deficiency in Iranian population, particularly in pregnant women, and its negative impact on pregnancy outcomes, the current study was designed to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation in the first and second trimesters on GDM in high-risk women.


  Materials and methods Top


Study design and participants

This study was a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial that was carried out on 90 pregnant high-risk women in the first trimester with in the Obstetrics and Gynecology section of Be`sat hospital clinic offices in Sanandaj, Iran, in 2013. Sample size was calculated according to previous studies [2],[3] considering the type one error rate α = 0.05, and statistical power 1-β = 0.9 for detecting a. At the beginning of the study, 110 participants were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and 100 pregnant women were included and randomly divided into two groups using permuted block randomization of size two. The number of participants in each group was 50, but finally 46 and 44 participants per group remained in the analysis stage [Figure 1]. Pregnant women with the following criteria were included; at least one risk factor for gestational diabetes including body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2 ) more than 25, history of macrosome neonate, positive family history for diabetes and gestational diabetes, history of gestational diabetes in previous pregnancies, and glycosuria. Exclusion criteria were as follows: Chronic diseases including renal, rheumatologic, hepatic, thyroid; pregnant women who had had diabetes before pregnancy; gestational diabetes at the time of admission; history of consuming vitamin D and drugs that interfere with glucose metabolism. Blinding was carried out in which drugs and placebos were prepared to be completely similar in appearance and taste and put in numbered pockets based on a randomization, list and neither the patients nor the physician knew the trend. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kordestan University of Medical Sciences and carried out in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. After complete explanation of the study details, written informed consent was obtained from eligible patients and their legally authorized representatives, informing the participants of their rights to withdraw from the trial at any time without any interruption in their health care benefits. This trial was registered at the Iranian Clinical Trials Registry (IRCT number 14140742; www.irct.ir).
Figure 1: Flow diagram of the trial

Click here to view


Procedures and variables assessment

Then, randomization by simple randomization along with.

After entering the participants in the study, a glucose challenge test (GCT) was performed on all the patients in the first trimester. The women who were diagnosed with gestational diabetes were excluded from the study. Then, a blood sample was taken from women who had entered the study to measure the vitamin D level. Vitamin D level was determined in a laboratory by the Liebermann-Burchard method, in which the patient should fast for 12 h and not have a fatty dinner.

Women in the intervention group took vitamin D, 5000 units per week and women in the control group received placebo till the 26th week. Every month all the women were examined and their blood pressure were determined. GCT on the 26th week was carried out and gestational diabetes was determined.

Glucose tolerance test (GTT) was performed according to the following approach: Blood glucose was measured at baseline, then participants were given 75 g oral glucose, and blood glucose levels at 1 h and 2 h later were measured. The result for the glucose screening test was considered, as the fasting blood sugar was 100-120 mg/dL and 1 h after taking oral glucose equal or less than 140 mg/dL, while if blood glucose after 2 h was 140-200, it was considered to be impaired or positive GTT. Additionally, two impaired oral GTTs were considered as a positive test. [15]

All the patients were followed up till delivery. Type of delivery, Apgar score, and macrosome neonate were determined.

Statistical analysis

After collection the data were entered and analyzed using SPSS software. Quantitative data were expressed as mean (SD) and qualitative variables as frequency (percentage). Normality of quantitative data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot. Independent sample t-test was used for comparing normally distributed data between two groups, and chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for comparing qualitative ones.


  Results Top


[Table 1] presents the results of comparing the demographic and basic clinical variables between the two studied groups. Significant differences were found in two groups only in terms of educational levels (P < 0.01) and history of diabetes (P < 0.05), and the studied groups were similar based on other variables., residential place.
Table 1: Demographic and basic baseline characteristics of study participants in two groups

Click here to view


The results of our study showed that at the end of the study intervention period there was no significant difference between the two studied groups in terms of blood pressure and birth weight outcome (P > 0.1) [Table 2]. In addition, no significant differences were observed before and after intervention in each groups in SBP and DBP (results not shown).
Table 2: Results of comparing the SBP, DBP, and birth weight at end of study between the two study groups

Click here to view


[Table 3] presents the results of comparing the main study's outcomes, i.e., the abnormality in GTT and GCT levels between the two groups. As can be seen, significantly higher percentages of positive GTT (34.8% vs 11.4%) and GCT (35.6% vs10.9%) were observed in the control group compared with participants in the vitamin D supplementation group; both P < 0.01. Similar results were observed in stratified analysis based on the history of diabetes, in which the participants in the control group with and without history of diabetes experienced significant higher proportions of positive GTT and GCT than the intervention group (results not shown).
Table 3: Main outcomes in intervention and control groups at the end of study

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The current study was designed to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation in the first and second trimesters on GDM in high-risk women. Results showed that vitamin D supplementation in the first and second trimesters has an effect on GDM), in which significantly higher percentages of positive GTT (34.8% vs 11.4%) and GCT (35.6% vs 10.9%) were observed in the control group compared with participants in the vitamin D supplementation group; both P < 0.01. Pregnancy consequences including macrosome neonate and increased C/S were not different in intervention and placebo groups.

Evidences show that vitamin D metabolism is related to diabetes incidence and its exacerbations. In most studies on pancreas in vitro or in vivo, [22],[23],[24],[25] results have shown that there are vitamin D receptors and vitamin D 3 binding proteins in pancreatic beta cells and in this way vitamin D can be influential in insulin secretion. [25],[26],[27] Moreover, in studies on rats, vitamin D deficiency is associated with lower insulin secretion, and vitamin D supplementation therapy caused appropriate insulin secretion and improved glucose tolerance in these animals. [25],[26],[27]

In a study by Lacroix et al.(2013) [28] on low level of vitamin D in the first trimester and its relationship with increased gestational diabetes, results showed that women with lower vitamin D level were 1.48 times at higher risk for gestational diabetes than women who received vitamin D (P = 0.04), and our study results showed that pregnant women in the first trimester who received vitamin D had less GDM than women who received placebo, and this is statistically significant (P = 0.009).

In a cross-sectional study by Hoseinnejad et al. [29] that was done on 741 pregnant women, after adjustment for BMI, a significant relationship was observed between insulin resistance index and insulin sensitivity index with vitamin D serum concentrations. They concluded that gestational diabetes prevalence is higher in pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency (less than 10 ng/L) than in women with a normal level of vitamin. Particularly in severe deficiency, accordingly sufficient levels of vitamin D can be effective in blood glucose control in pregnant women. [28]

Asemi et al. investigated the effect of vitamin D and calcium on blood sugar control, inflammation, and oxidative stress in gestational diabetes in a clinical trial. Their results showed a significant reduction in plasma glucose tolerance and the insulin level in serum in comparison with the placebo group (P = 0.001). [30] Inappropriate metabolism of insulin during gestational diabetes can cause complications in pregnancy such as macrosome neonate, trauma in birth, and preeclampsia. [17],[31],[32] Asemi et al. also concluded that pregnancy outcomes such as neonate weight as well as C/S rate were not different between the intervention and placebo groups. [30] Other studies showed that women who had received less vitamin D were at higher risk of gestational diabetes, which caused macrosome neonate and thus more C/S [17] and more surgery risk as well as higher risk of type II diabetes. [14] Evidence declares that neonates of women with gestational diabetes are at risk of glucose intolerance, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, which cause a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases in their children. [15]

In a study by Farrant et al., the participants with vitamin deficiency received vitamin D and calcium supplementation at the 30th week; no association was found between vitamin D deficiency and gestational diabetes. However, it should be noted that this study was limited to women admitted to the hospital and its results could not be generalized to the whole population, and also, in line with our results, they did not find any relation with macrosome neonate. [18]

Clinical trials in different part of world have shown that the effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women increases birth weight and height. [21],[33],[34],[35] However, in a study on Asian women living in England, no relation was demonstrated between vitamin D and birth weight. [33] Different results in various trials can be attributed to the difference in supplementation period and levels of vitamin D in participants.

In a study by Rudnicki and Pedersen. [21] the effect of vitamin D caused reduction of glucose tolerance in gestational diabetes, which was statistically significant. In other studies, reduction of OGT was not seen after vitamin D injection, while some other studies showed possible effects of vitamin D on glucose metabolism because of the effect of insulin secretion on beta cells. [35],[36] Zhou et al. [37] examined the effect of vitamin D on pregnancy outcomes, and their results showed that at the end of pregnancy, macrosome neonate, rate of C/S, birth weight, and congenital abnormalities were observed, consistent with our study's results; however, no decrease was observed in the Apgar score, while the prevalence of gestational diabetes and preterm delivery was higher in the group who had received higher levels of vitamin D than in women who had received low or moderate levels of vitamin D. [37],[38]

The possible strengths of our study can be described as follows: This was the first study of high-risk pregnant women administered to vitamin D supplementation over the first two trimesters of pregnancy. Accordingly, it provides preliminary insight into the possible positive effects on gestational diabetes. On the other hand, the not-high patient compliance rate can be considered as a possible limitation. As there was the possibility for gynecology specialists to recommend patients to discontinue the drug, in order to prevent any misunderstanding, the purpose and procedure of the study were described to the specialists in a meeting.


  Conclusion Top


Our study showed that vitamin D supplementation for high-risk pregnant women in the first and second trimesters has an effective impact on gestational diabetes.

Acknowledgments

It is necessary to thank from Be`sat hospital staffs and participants who have helped us in this research.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.


  Authors Contribution Top


SS contributed in the conception of the work, conducting the study, revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript, and agreed for all aspects of the work. FF contributed in the conception of the work, drafting and revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript, and agreed for all aspects of the work. BP contributed in the conception of the work, conducting the study, revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript, and agreed for all aspects of the work.

 
  References Top

1.
Bouillon R. Non-classical actions of the vitamin D endocrine system. Bone 2007;40(Suppl 1):S9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Brooke OG, Brown IR, Bone CD, Carter ND, Cleeve HJ, Maxwell JD, et al. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: Effects on calcium status and fetal growth. Br Med J 1980;280:751-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Brooke OG, Brown IR, Cleeve HJ, Sood A. Observations on the vitamin D state of pregnant Asian women in London. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981;88:18-26.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hamilton SA, McNeil R, Hollis BW, Davis DJ, Winkler J, Cook C, et al. Profound vitamin D deficiency in a diverse group of women during pregnancy living in a sun-rich environment at latitude 32° N. Int J Endocrinol 2010;2010:917428.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Johnson DD, Wagner CL, Hulsey TC, McNeil RB, Ebeling M, Hollis BW. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is common during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:7-12.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Robinson CJ, Alanis MC, Wagner CL, Hollis BW, Johnson DD. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:366.e1-6.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Merewood A, Mehta SD, Chen TC, Bauchner H, Holick MF. Association between vitamin D deficiency and primary cesarean section. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:940-5.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bodnar LM, Krohn MA, Simhan HN. Maternal vitamin D deficiency is associated with bacterial vaginosis in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Nutr 2009;139:1157-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Javaid MK, Crozier SR, Harvey NC, Gale CR, Dennison EM, Boucher BJ, et al.; Princess Anne Hospital Study Group. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age 9 years: A longitudinal study. Lancet 2006;367:36-43.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Morley R, Carlin JB, Pasco JA, Wark JD. Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone concentrations and offspring birth size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:906-12.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Viljakainen HT, Saarnio E, Hytinantti T, Miettinen M, Surcel H, Mäkitie O, et al. Maternal vitamin D status determines bone variables in the newborn. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:1749-57.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bowyer L, Catling-Paull C, Diamond T, Homer C, Davis G, Craig ME. Vitamin D, PTH and calcium levels in pregnant women and their neonates. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;70:372-7.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Wagner CL, Greer FR; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2008;122:1142-52.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vambergue A, Dognin C, Boulogne A, Rejou MC, Biausque S, Fontaine P. Increasing incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance in women with prior abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy: DIAGEST 2 study. Diabet Med 2008;25:58-64.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tai K, Need AG, Horowitz M, Chapman IM. Glucose tolerance and vitamin D: Effects of treating vitamin D deficiency. Nutrition 2008;24:950-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kirwan JP, Huston-Presley L, Kalhan SC, Catalano PM. Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1602-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Tsai PJ, Roberson E, Dye T. Gestational diabetes and macrosomia by race/ethnicity in Hawaii. BMC Res Notes 2013;6:395.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wei SQ, Qi HP, Luo ZC, Fraser WD. Maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:889-99.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Farrant HJ, Krishnaveni GV, Hill JC, Boucher BJ, Fisher DJ, Noonan K, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency is common in Indian mothers but is not associated with gestational diabetes or variation in newborn size. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009;63:646-52.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bourlon PM, Billaudel B, Faure-Dussert A. Influence of vitamin D3 deficiency and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 on de novo insulin biosynthesis in the islets of the rat endocrine pancreas. J Endocrinol 1999;160:87-95.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rudnicki PM, Mølsted-Pedersen L. Effect of 1, 25-dihydroxycholecalciferol on glucose metabolism in gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1997;40:40-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Jelsma JG, van Poppel MN, Galjaard S, Desoye G, Corcoy R, Devlieger R, et al. DALI: Vitamin D and lifestyle intervention for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevention: An European multicentre, randomised trial-study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:142.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Gestational diabetes mellitus. Practice Bulletin NO. 137. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2013:122:406-16.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Labriji-Mestaghanmi H, Billaudel B, Garnier PE, Malaisse WJ, Sutter BC. Vitamin D and Pancreatic islet function. I. Time course for changes in insulin secretion and content during vitamin deprivation and repletion. J Endocrinol Invest 1988;11:577-84.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Gedik O, Akalin S. Effects of vitamin D deficiency and repletion on insulin and glucagon secretion in man. Diabetologia 1986;29:142-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Scragg R, Holdaway I, Singh V, Meltcalf P, Baker J, Dryson E. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels decreased in Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;27:181-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chertow BS, Sivitz WI, Baranetsky NG, Clark SA, Waite A, Deluca HF. Cellular mechanisms of insulin release: Effects of vitamin D deficiency and repletion on rat insulin secretion. Endocrinology 1983;113:1511-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lacroix M, Battista MC, Doyon M, Houde G, Ménard J, Ardilouze JL, et al. Lower vitamin D levels at first trimester are associated with higher risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 2014;51:609-16.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Hossein-Nejad A, Maghbooli J, Arzaghi S, Shafaei A, Rahmani M, Larijani B. Relationship between vitamin D deficiency and gestational diabetes mellitus. IJDLD 2006;5:226-35.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Asemi Z, Karamali M, Esmaillzadeh A. Effects of calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation on glycaemic control, inflammation and oxidative stress in gestational diabetes: A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Diabetologia 2014;57:1798-806.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, et al.; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Burris HH, Camargo CA Jr. Time for large randomised trials of vitamin D for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to improve perinatal health outcomes. Diabetologia 2014;57:1746-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Soheilykhah S, Mojibian M, Moghadam MJ, Shojaoddiny-Ardekani A. The effect of different doses of vitamin D supplementation on insulin resistance during pregnancy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013;29:396-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Marya RK, Rathee S, Dua V, Sangwan K. Effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on foetal growth. Indian J Med Res 1998;88:488-92.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Jovanovic L, Knopp RH, Brown Z, Conley MR, Park E, Mills JL, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study Group. Declining insulin requirement in the late first trimester of diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1130-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Inomata S, Kadowaki S, Yamatani T, Fukase M, Fujita T. Effect of 1a (OH)-vitamin D3 on insulin secretion in diabetes mellitus. Bone Miner 1986;1:187-92.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Orwoll E, Riddle M, Prince M. Effects of vitamin D on insulin and glucagon secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59:1083-7.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Zhou J, Su L, Liu M, Liu Y, Cao X, Wang Z, et al. Associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and pregnancy outcomes: A prospective observational study in southern China. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:925-30.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Pre-pregnancy dietary micronutrient adequacy is associated with lower risk of developing gestational diabetes in Australian women
Moniek Looman,Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker,Sabita S. Soedamah-Muthu,Gita D. Mishra,Anouk Geelen,Edith J.M. Feskens
Nutrition Research. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Effects of Vitamin D Deficiency on Incidence Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Mansour Amraei,Safoura Mohamadpour,Kourosh Sayehmiri,Seyedeh Fatemeh Mousavi,Ehsan Shirzadpour,Ardeshir Moayeri
Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2018; 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 An overview of Type 2 Diabetes and Importance of Vitamin D3-vitamin D receptor interaction in Pancreatic -cells
Abraham Neelankal John,Fang-Xu Jiang
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Vitamin D Replacement in Children, Adolescents and Pregnant Women in the Middle East and North Africa
M Chakhtoura,S El Ghandour,K Shawwa,EA Akl,A Arabi,Z Mahfoud,RH Habib,H Hoballah,G El Hajj Fuleihan
Metabolism. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Immunological function of vitamin D during human pregnancy
Jin-Lu Ji,Kahinho P. Muyayalo,Yong-Hong Zhang,Xiao-Hui Hu,Ai-Hua Liao
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2017; : e12716
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Conclusion
Authors Contribution
Discussion
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Conclusion
Authors Contribution
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1224    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded388    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal